Obama - A Mistake the Israelis Cannot Afford to Make

In baseball terms, it's called "taking one for the team". In other words, Obama would like to demand that Israel sacrifices its security to test Iran's willingness to make peace.

Neither Obama nor his minions will put it in those terms but they allude to the "linkage" between the urgent need for Israel to make peace with the Palestinians and Iran's willingness to give up their quest for nuclear weapons.

The "linkage" idea was thrown around by Rahm Emanuel, Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton and it is a foolish idea, real only in the minds of those who refuse to see three fundamental realities of the Mideast.

The first is that Palestinian culture is dominated by a culture of death and bloody "martyrdom", with children programs, music videos and mosque sermons all glorifying death and war against the Jews.

The second reality is that Iran has repeatedly demonstrated that it will not give up its nuclear aspirations voluntarily. Even its so-called "moderate" leaders see the bomb as a ticket to regional dominance and the final victory over Israel. One such "moderate" called Israel "a one bomb country," meaning one would be enough.

The third reality is that there is simply no linkage between the creation of a Palestinian state and Iran's ambition for nukes. To believe otherwise is to believe Iran embarked on the nuclear quest because the Palestinians lacked a state. Nobody in their right mind believes that.

Yet Obama is charging full speed ahead with its vision of a deal, conforming to the liberal Democrats' view that Netanyahu and Israeli conservatives are the problem.

If Israel were to agree to Obama's demand, it likely would get the worst of both worlds: more violence from the Palestinians while Iran merrily moves toward the bomb.

It would be suicidal for Israel to entertain the idea of a nuclear Iran. Even if they assume Iran would not 'nuke' Israel (out of fear that a counterstrike), the Iranian possession of a nuke would wreak havoc do to the morale of its society. The Israelis would be living under threat of a Holocaust every day.

Just because the American people has been fooled into trusting Obama does not mean that the Israelis should make the same mistake.

Hillary leaves the Senate for a post in the Obama Administration -Good Ridance!

In a clear way to settle some political debts, Hillary Clinton appears to be in line for a promotion.

New Yorkers should rejoice, because it means she will no longer be the steward of the Upstate New York economy.

When Hillary Clinton ran for Senate in 2000, she promised economic revitalization for New Yorkers living north of New York City and its suburbs. She even went so far as to promise 200,000 new jobs for the region. Gullible New Yorkers believed her and gave her a chance.
Eight years later, and Hillary Clinton still hasn’t created 200,000 jobs, because Hillary Clinton cannot create jobs. Neither can Big Government or Liberal bureaucrats.

In fact, Upstate New York has lost 20,000 private sector jobs while manufacturing jobs, once the life-blood of Upstate, have declined by 24%. Obviously, she did not fulfill her pledge to New Yorkers.

If anything, Senator Clinton’s failed promises are emblematic of today’s political culture. Not only do we tolerate falsehoods and failed promises, we expect them! Obama is not even the acting President and he is already working on his "exit strategy" out of the grandiose promises he made during the campaign. He is now alerting people that he “may not get there in one year or even in one term.”

Obama's charisma will no doubt, make it difficult to hold him accountable, and he will be able to continue sailing on the winds of "change" for quite a while before most Americans will wake up and understand that they have believing in a mirage.

As for Hillary, it is difficult to discern exactly what she has done since taking office, other than run for higher office, but it is clear she lacks the competence or the political will to energize the New York economy. New Yorkers should be pleased that Hillary will be kicked upstairs, especially not to any position relating to job creation or economic revitalization.

As far as the foreign leaders are concerned, that's another matter....

Hillary is the Winner!

Hillary Clinton likes to presents herself as former first lady and a New York senator ready to be commander-in-chief. But a history of exaggerations, half-truths and downright lies made by Clinton over the last 15 years have undermined her credibility and created an image of a dishonest person. In a recent study, she comes out as the undisputed winner among the other 2 presidential contenders when it comes to tail tales. Here’s the chain of lies:

1. Travelgate, June 23, 2000
An investigation was launched into the firing of seven long-time employees of the White House travel office, all of whom were replaced with friends and relatives of the Clintons.

Lie: In a sworn deposition, Clinton was asked if she had any involvement in the decision to fire the staffers: “No, I did not,” she replied.

Truth: The Office of Independent Counsel investigating it and other matters found "overwhelming evidence that she in fact did have a role in the decision to fire the employees” and that her testimony was “factually false.”

2. Iraq War Vote, Jan. 13, 2008

On NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Clinton was asked about her 2002 vote to authorize the use of force against Iraq. Her vote helped authorize President Bush to use force in Iraq.

Lie: Clinton insisted it was “not a vote for preemptive war. It was a vote to put inspectors back in to determine what threat Saddam Hussein did in fact pose,” Clinton said.

Truth: On Oct. 10, 2002, on the Senate floor, Clinton said, “This is a very difficult vote … any vote that might lead to war should be hard, but I cast it with conviction.

3. Sniper Fire, March 17, 2008

In 1996 Clinton visited Bosnia as first lady.

Lie: She told an audience at the George Washington University that she remembered “landing under sniper fire.” She made similar comments to other audiences.

Truth: Videotape of her arrival at Tuzla Air Base shows Clinton walking off the plane, greeting troops and walking calmly around camp. She is then met by a young girl who reads her a poem.

4. Vince Foster Documents, April 22, 1994

After the suicide of Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, Hillary Clinton’s chief of staff Maggie Williams had documents removed from Foster’s office.

Half-truth: During a press conference, Clinton was asked why Williams was involved in removing the documents. Clinton responded: “I don’t know that she did remove any documents.”

Truth: Clinton administrations officials later acknowledged that the first lady requested the documents be removed and turned over to Williams. Williams was told to store the papers in the White House residence, where Clinton’s personal attorney later picked them up.

5. Iraq War Criticism, April 5, 2008

Lie: In Eugene, Ore., Clinton said that she was first to criticize the Iraq war, before Barack Obama, during their time in the Senate. “I started criticizing the war in Iraq before he did,” she said.

Truth: On Jan. 18, 2005, Obama criticized the war to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee while questioning Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. On Jan. 26, eight days later, Clinton said the Bush administration’s Iraq policy was “riddled with errors, misstatements and misjudgments.”

6. Brokering Irish Peace, Jan. 6, 2008

Lie: In Nashua, N.H., Clinton told supporters that when she was first lady she organized a town hall in Belfast, Ireland, to help promote peace talks between Catholics and Protestants.

Truth: There is no record of a meeting at Belfast City Hall between Catholic and Protestant representatives that she supposedly arranged. Hillary held a 50-minute meeting of Catholic and Protestant women at a Belfast café on Nov. 30, 1995, arranged by the U.S. Embassy, and she attended a Christmas tree lighting ceremony with President Clinton at Belfast City Hall. That was all!

7. Chelsea Jogging, Sept. 17, 2001

Lie: Clinton told NBC’s Jane Pauley that her daughter, Chelsea, went jogging on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, and had planned to run near the World Trade Center.

Truth: In a Nov. 9, 2001, article in Talk magazine, Chelsea Clinton never wrote she went jogging on Sept. 11, 2001. Instead, Clinton said she was alone inside a friend’s apartment 12 blocks away when the first plane struck the World Trade Center. She watched the second plane hit the South Tower on her friend’s television.

8. Death of a Mother, March 2008

For about five weeks, Clinton told a story related to her by an Ohio deputy sheriff about a pregnant woman who lost her baby and died two weeks later.

Half-truth: Clinton said the woman was uninsured and was refused medical treatment because she could not come up with a $100 examination fee.

Truth: Trina Bachtel, 35, died last August, two weeks after her son was stillborn. But she did have health insurance and was not denied treatment for her troubled pregnancy when she sought help at a hospital in Athens, Ohio. She had, however, been asked to pay $100 for treatment at a clinic she first visited.

9. Refugee Borders, March 12, 2008

Lie: Clinton said in a cable news interview that she “negotiated open borders” in Macedonia to fleeing Kosovar refugees.

Truth: Macedonia’s ambassador to the U.S. at the time, said during a March 2008 interview with NPR that her government always had a policy to allow refugees’ passage into the country.

10. Origins of the Name, April 2, 1995

Lie: At an airstrip in Nepal, Clinton told Sir Edmund Hillary, the first man to conquer Mount Everest, that she had been named after the renowned mountaineer.

Truth: Clinton was born in 1947, when Sir Edmund was still an obscure beekeeper from New Zealand. He did not climb Everest until 1953, six years later.

11. National Guard Health Insurance, Dec. 20, 2007

Lie: Clinton’s television ad, “Guard,” which ran in New Hampshire, claimed National Guard and Army Reserve personnel had no health insurance until she took action.

Truth: Before Clinton took office, all active-duty Guard and Reserve troops were covered by federal insurance, and four out of five non-active-duty National Guardsmen and Reservists were covered by their civilian employers or other sources.

12. Bill Kennedy Endorsement, April 15, 2008

Clinton scored an endorsement from a Montana politician, Yellowstone County
Commissioner Bill Kennedy.

Lie: A press release from Clinton’s campaign said Kennedy was prompted to go for Clinton because of remarks Barack Obama made to a group of California donors in which he said small-town Americans get bitter and “cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them” as a way to explain their frustrations.

Truth: Kennedy told FOX News a day after the release: “I had been leaning toward Hillary for months. I actually decided to endorse her two weeks ago.” In other words, Kennedy decided to back Clinton on April 1, five days before Obama’s comments.

No wonder that most of the Democrats' politburo, her ex-Hollywood pals and even close allies from the Clinton era (Bill Richardson) are leaving her in droves...

History Lessons

Speaking before the Knesset on the 60th Anniversary of founding of the State of Israel, President Bush took a shot at those who claim that talking with terrorists will result in "peace" and said that they are experiencing a “foolish delusion.”














Feeling the pinch, the Democrats immediately launched a barrage of "outrage and criticism" although Bush never mentioned them or any one by name. Apparently, if the shoe fits....

"Personal and aggressive diplomacy" with Iran is one of Obama's stated mantras so he was one the first to feel personally attacked. The Senator is obviously ignorant of history, which clearly shows the fallacies of such irresponsible policies.

The Left "New Appeasement" theory has its roots in the basic belief that America is "down right a mean country" (Michelle Obama) and as such, we are the cause of all that's evil in the world. American "Imperialism and Capitalism" is what pushes people to blow themselves up and kill innocents who do not agree with them. Since we are the problem, the theory goes, we should blame ourselves and "reach out" to those poor creatures out there ("terrorists have mother and fathers too" - Rosie O'Donnell), understand them, negotiate with them and we will leave like a big happy family.
If there were no history to contradict such rosy-psychedelic-marijuana smoke-filled theory, I'd simply say "Stop smoking the grass and wise up!". But when history provides so much testimony to the dangers of this type of thought, I think that entertaining it is not only delusional, but down right criminally insane.

France and Britain appeased monsters like Hitler and Mussolini because they felt that they were "misunderstood" and that they shared some blame in the conclusion of WW I ("the Treaty of Versailles was too harsh on Germany"). Meeting with Daladier and Chamberlain served only to legitimize Hitler and show him as a world "leader" instead of the murderous thug that he and his Nazi gang were.

Obama meeting with the new Hitler from Tehran will serve the same purpose, since Obama and the Left are completely ignorant of radical Islam's true plans. Obama doesn't know or doesn't care that he will be talking with a genocidal maniac who sees the world in terms of Islam and the rest and whose stated dream is to bring about an Apocalypse which will usher in the Age of Lost Imam.

Just like Chamberlain and his group of deluded politicians thought that what is written in "Mein Kampf" should not be taken seriously, so do Obama, Hillary and their Leftist cohorts ignore the stated goals of today's Islamo-Nazis. This political blindness has the potential to do much more damage than the casual political expediency which we're witnessing from the Democratic Party. Like in the late 1930's, this policy can bring about another world war. And if Iran is allowed to acquire nuclear weapons, it may just cause the Armageddon that the Hitler from Tehran is praying for.

We need a president who is not paranoid about confronting these threats and does not have a problem with hunting down terrorists and killing them. You do not negotiate with Al-Qaeda, Hamas or Hezbollah. You crush them! And this is how you send a message to their masters in Damascus or Tehran that you mean business and they are next.
After seeing the US resolute in the wake of 9/11, Qaddafi thought it is wise to abandon his weapons of mass destruction dreams. Standing firm and resolute with Iran will send the message to its "dogs" - Syria, Hezbollah, Hamas that the US is serious about confronting them and the military option is on the table.

Obama and Hillary are too weak and too dependent on their far left base to confront Islamo-Nazism. Only John McCain can continue the Bush Doctrine of Preemptive strikes against criminal nations.

Those who do not know history are condemned to repeat it.

Guess Who's Coming to the Seder

For centuries, Jews have gathered around the Seder table to celebrate Pesach (Passover), the deliverance from slavery to freedom. This family holiday is marked not only by the ubiquitous matza, but mainly by the reading of the Hagada, the recounting of the events that led to the freedom of the ancient Israelites. Everyone participates in the reading and especially the singing, which is what makes the Seder such a joyful experience.
As we ask "Ma Nishtana Ha'Layla Ha'Ze" - What's Different This Night from all other nights?, an answer (which is not in the Hagada) is that this Passover in 5768 (2008 AD) falls in an election year in the USA. All three candidates wanted to participate in the political Passover. The Torah mentions "four sons": the wise one, the wicked one, the naive one and the one who doesn't know how to ask. In their trying to appeal to the Jewish vote, you decide who is who:

Barak Obama noted that the Passover Seder ceremony encourages children to ask questions. He interpreted that as meaning that American policy should emphasize dialogue. He previously has said that if he were elected president, he would talk with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad who is a Holocaust denier and dreams of "wiping Israel off the map". However, he has rejected the idea of sitting down for discussions with Hamas, which is funded by Iran. I guess his thinking is why talk to the dogs when I can talk directly to their masters?
Obama is clearly naive. He is he also wicked when he tries to appear as a friend of Israel (despite his public support for the Palestinian cause and his refusal to condemn Carter's useless trip to the Middle East) or of the Jews (when his friends, Jeremiah Wright and Louis Farrakan are racists and anti-Semites)?

Hillary Clinton used the Hagada to make a call "to stand up to oppression, tyranny and discrimination." She also paid a surprise visit to a Jewish federation-sponsored Philadelphia Orchestra concert celebrating Israel's 60th birthday. She made no political comments, but her appearance was part of a last-ditch effort to garner more votes in Tuesday's state primaries. Hillary is not naive and does know how to ask but she is as wicked as they come because her perfidy and dishonesty know no limits. She couldn't care less about Israel, as she proved it when she stood by Suha Arafat which was spewing vicious statements about Israelis poisoning Palestinian children. She does care about Jews, American Jews to be precise, because there are, unfortunately, many foolish enough to donate money to her and because Jews are still overwhelmingly blind to continue following the Democratic Party despite its increasingly leftist and anti-Israeli stance (although the number of Republican Jews has more than doubled since Bush became President in 2000).

Republican candidate John McCain appears to be the most Zionist of the three candidates who commented on the Passover Seder and the reading of the traditional Hagada, according to The New York Times op-ed writer William Kristol. McCain, who was a prisoner of war during the war in Vietnam, was the only one of the three candidates who linked the story of the Exodus from slavery in Egypt with attacks on Jews. He commented that three IDF soldiers who were kidnapped two years ago "will celebrate [Passover] once again, in captivity.”

The older, the wiser....Hag Sameach! (Happy Holiday!)

Hillary and Elena

There once was a vile, horrible woman called Elena Ceausescu. She was married to a dictator, called Nicolae Ceausescu and they lived in a far, far away little country, hidden in the Eastern corner of Europe. Together, the Ceausescus lived a happy life oppressing their subjects and thinking of themselves as King and Queen. Although feared by the people, they were often ridiculed by them in countless jokes and stories, while a "vast right wing conspiracy" was constantly exposing them for what they really were (albeit broadcasting on "Free Europe" from the safety of Germany).
Their incompetent reign did not last happily ever after and came down to a violent end 30 long years after their ascendancy to the throne. THE END! (well, not really, since other incompetent knights fought for the throne which has been passed from a thief to another ever since, but that's another story for another night).

Why am I telling you this story (don't tell it to your kids at night; it may cause them long nightmares)? Watching the news today and hearing about yet another lie from the by now, pathological liar, Hillary Clinton, I realized that she has so much in common with Elena Ceausescu and decided to check the similarities. Lets see:

- Both Elena and Hillary think that they're smarter than their husbands and while Hillary is far more educated and smarter than Elena ever was, their ambitions had no limits.
- Both are ruthless when it comes to dealing with dissent. Elena preferred to destroy her opposition physically; Hillary would love to do that, be she cannot (living in a free country is a bitch...). Instead, she 's a character murderer.
- Both Elena and Hillary are despised by the majority of the population and ridiculed in countless jokes and satire.
- Both Elena and Hillary have a deep sense of entitlement. Presidency is owed to them and any one coming in their way must be crushed.
- Both lie through their teeth to a degree that they can't distinguish any longer between illusion and reality.
- Both would like to think that they've done so much "for the people" but both have a tough time when they have to actually point at some of their record (one thought she was an "eminent" chemistry scientist and the other would like you to believe that she brought peace to Norther Ireland -both ridiculous claims, of course!)
- Both are power hungry to the extreme and both made fortunes in less than honest ways: one by appropriating a country, the other by conducting questionable deals and pandering to special interests (again, the limitations of living in a free country, damn it!).

I'm sure that I could think of more examples, but I think you get the point. Now, to be fair, I certainly don't wish upon Hillary the same end that befell on Elena. I just hope that she will get the response that she deserves from the American people: GO AWAY!....oh,.....and take Slick Willie with you. As if being Senator is not punishment enough to the good people of NY....

McCain visits Israel, Hillary exposed

On March 18th, John McCain will visit Israel. He will be accompanied by Senators Joe Lieberman and Lindsay Graham. Matt Brooks of the Republican Jewish Coalition said the trip was "an incredibly important gesture on Senator McCain's part. It reflects his understanding of how important the issue of Israel's security is for him to take the time out in the middle of a
campaign to show his support and solidarity."

I think that I voice the opinion of many others when I say that a McCain-Lieberman ticket would be a great option. When the Democrats seem so excited about a woman and/or a black man as their Presidential nominees, having Lieberman on the VP slot would go a long way.

For starters, it will sway the Jewish vote away from the Democrats (especially if Obama wins the nomination). There have already been reports that should Obama beat Hillary in the Democratic race, there will be a strong move of the Jewish vote to the Republican side. More and more Jews start to realize that the Democratic Party is not as stanch a supporter of Israel as it ones was. Certainly Obama's link to a racist anti-Semite pastor (whom he knows for 20 years!) and his endorsement by the most invective and disgusting American racist, are no reasons to vote Democratic in November.

Second, Lieberman is well liked and admired in his home state of Connecticut, one of the bluest states in the nation. Could Connecticut be in play? I strongly believe that with Lieberman on the GOP ticket, Florida will fall solidly into the Republican camp.

Third, Lieberman brings strong credentials of tough on national security and the war on terror.

Forth, Lieberman was elected in 2006 as an Independent after losing the Democratic primary for re-election in Connecticut to a far left Ned Lamont, which got the support of the Party nomenclature. There is no lost love between Lieberman and the Democrats and the Liberals won't have much to attack the man who, in 2000 was the first Jewish vice presidential candidate and ran with their beloved Al Gore.

I know that Lieberman has repeatedly insisted he is not interested in the Republican vice presidential nomination, despite his endorsement of McCain and persistent campaigning for him.
But photos of McCain in Jerusalem with Lieberman are bound to be a major piece of his outreach to Jewish voters.

On the pinhead category (borrowing a note from the Great Bill O'Reilly), here's Hillary Clinton bragging that her "extensive" foreign policy experience makes her best prepared to meet national security challenges on "Day One".

<<"You know," she said, "helping to support the peace process in Northern Ireland, negotiating to open borders so that (Kosovar) refugees fleeing ethnic cleansing would be safe, going to Beijing and standing up for women's rights as human rights and so much else.">>

But it turns out Hillary exaggerated her list of foreign policy accomplishments, which is really quite pathetic considering how meager they already are.

First, she never played a key role in brokering peace in Northern Ireland, according to former first minister David Trimble, who said she had no direct role in the talks.

Second, Hillary did travel to Macedonia in May 1999, and she did visit refugee camps near the Kosovo border. However, no one knows how she helped the Kosovar refugees when Macedonia reopened its border to them before her visit.

And finally, when she was in Beijing, she carried no official portfolio while speaking on women's rights there.

Hillary did not attend any National Security Council meetings, never sat in the Situation Room during crises, never read in on presidential security briefings and she was not part of the Cabinet.

She did, however, take campaign checks from Chinese bagmen for the People's Liberation Army.

Hillary couldn't even answer MSNBC host Tim Russert's question about Russian President Putin's hand-picked successor:

Russert: Who will it be? Do you know his name?

Hillary: Medved —

Russert: Medvedev.

Hillary: Medvedeva — whatever —

Russert: Yes.

Hillary: Yes. (Giggle.)

Whatever? She runs adds trying to convince us that she is ready "On Day One" and will pick up that telephone at 3:00 AM but can't even say who the President of Russia is? What a fake, phony fraud she is....

One of Obama's foreign policy advisers, Susan Rice, said it best when she confessed that neither he nor Hillary would be ready to pick up the White House red phone at 3 a.m.

Qaddafi is right

I didn't think that I'll ever say this, but Muammar al-Qaddafi, the Dictator of Libya, is right. Then again, even a broken a clock is right twice a day.

"I've seen that in America, a candidate who wants people to vote for him keeps talking about change," Qaddafi said earlier this week in a televised address on Libyan TV, an obvious reference to Barack Obama.

"They all keep saying 'change, change,' " he continued, adding Hillary Clinton to his reference. "They want to change America and its current political system. They want to make a change in their lives. They say their system is a failure, that their government is a failure, and that their elections are a failure."

He then lost it, rumbling about how all the world should adopt the "Libyan model" of a "Republic for the Masses", etc., etc., etc.....an idea which appeals more to the average European leftist than to the Arab street.

Qaddafi's lunacy notwithstanding, one must admit that he has a point and sees the emptiness of the Democrats' message. Now if he can also advise them on matters of Foreign Policy, I think the Liberals have a "winner" this coming November....

Madame Hillary's Impressive Resume of Achievements

Hillary Clinton has been telling America that she is the most qualified candidate for president based on her 'record,' which she says includes eight years in the White House as First Lady - or 'co-president' -and seven years in the Senate.

For those who forgot (or those who have no idea what that "experience" is), here's a reminder of what her record includes:

- As First Lady, Hillary assumed authority over Health Care Reform, a process that cost the taxpayers over $13 million. She couldn't even get it to a vote in a Congress controlled by her own party.

- Hillary assumed authority over selecting a female Attorney General. Her first two recommendations (Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood) were forced to withdraw their names from consideration, and then she chose Janet Reno. Janet Reno has since been described by Bill himself as 'my worst mistake.'

- Hillary recommended Lani Guanier for head of the Civil Rights Commission. When Guanier's radical views became known (namely her obsession with "Black Power" and affirmative action), her name had to be withdrawn.

- Hillary recommended her former law partners, Web Hubbell, Vince Foster, and William Kennedy for positions in the Justice Department, White House staff, and the Treasury, respectively. Hubbell was later imprisoned, Foster committed suicide, and Kennedy was forced to resign.

- Hillary also recommended a close friend, Craig Livingstone, for the position of director of White House security. When Livingstone was investigated for the improper access of up to 900 FBI files of Clinton enemies (Filegate) and the widespread use of drugs by White House staff, both Hillary and her husband denied knowing him.

- In order to open 'slots' in the White House for her friends the Harry Thomasons (to whom millions of dollars in travel contracts could be awarded), Hillary had the entire staff of the White House Travel Office fired; they were reported to the FBI for 'gross mismanagement' and their reputations ruined. After a thirty-month investigation, only one, Billy Dale, was charged with a crime - mixing personal money with White House funds when he cashed checks. The jury acquitted him in less than two hours.

- She urged her husband not to settle the Paula Jones lawsuit. The chain reaction that followed: She refused to release the Whitewater documents, which led to the appointment of Ken Starr as Special Prosecutor, which led to MonicaLewinsky, which led to Bill lying about and later admitting his affairs, which led to.... settle with Paula Jones after all. The results of her "bright" advice: Bill lost his law license for lying to the grand jury and was impeached by the House

- Hillary wrote 'It Take s a Village,' demonstrating her Socialist viewpoint.

- Hillary decided to seek election to the Senate in a state she had never lived in. Her husband pardoned FALN terrorists in order to get Latino support and the New Square Hassidim to get Jewish support. Hillary also had Bill pardon her brother's clients, for a small fee, to get financial support.

- When Hillary left the White House, she had to return $200,000 in White House furniture, china, and artwork she had stolen.

- Hillary's husband further protected her by asking the National Archives to withhold from the public until 2012 many records of their time in the White House, including much of Hillary's correspondence and her calendars. (There are ongoing lawsuits to force the release of those records.)

- Hillary's one notable vote, supporting the plan to invade Iraq , she has since disavowed.

Quite a resume, isn't it? Sounds more like a mixture of Sopranos and Elena Ceausescu. It looks like the Liberals have quite a choice to make this Election time, between an empty suit supported by racists and Anti-Semites and Madame Sopranos on stereoids....I don't envy them.